Re: [libxml++] (Another) example segfault

[Frederick Heckel <fwph cse wustl edu>]

Wow, go me. It's been a long week, and I wrote the wrong thing.. :)

I am, in fact, running Debian testing on that system. In fact, I have no problems
on the Debian stable systems which are most important for the software. But it'd be nicer
to develop on my workstation, and this is an issue that will come up eventually anyway.
Is there any particular trick for use on a testing system, which does apparently use g++ 4.0 (as 
compiling with g++ 3.3 does give the libstdc++ warning, but results in a different 
error, and g++ 3.4 gives the same results as 4.0)?

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:53:11 +0100 (CET)
"Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:

> 
> > Hi, I'm trying to use libxml++ 2.6 from Debian Sarge (stable), and I'm
> > getting a segfault from the DOM parser example program. g++ 4.0.2,
> 
> Doesn't debian sarge use g++ 3.3? In general you can't mix compilers like
> that.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
> Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
> for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general



(fwph)

--

Frederick Heckel
<fwph cse wustl edu> || <fwph sccs swarthmore edu>

========================================================
fortune sez:
Old age is too high a price to pay for maturity.