Re: [libxml++] (Another) example segfault

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 09:12 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 12:03 -0600, Frederick Heckel wrote:
> > Wow, go me. It's been a long week, and I wrote the wrong thing.. :)
> > 
> > I am, in fact, running Debian testing on that system. In fact, I have no problems
> > on the Debian stable systems which are most important for the software. But it'd be nicer
> > to develop on my workstation, and this is an issue that will come up eventually anyway.
> > Is there any particular trick for use on a testing system, which does apparently use g++ 4.0 (as 
> > compiling with g++ 3.3 does give the libstdc++ warning, but results in a different 
> > error, and g++ 3.4 gives the same results as 4.0)?
> 
> You can't mix g++ 3.3 and 4.0, ever. I think that 3.4 and 4.0 _might_ be
> ABI compatible.
> 
> But the libsigc++ supplied by your debian distribution should be
> compiled with the same C++ compiler that your debian distribution
> supplies by default. So if it's not working, this is probably a debian
> bug. If you submit a bug, please do mention the link here.

Did you submit a debian bug?

> Personally, I think debian testing is only for testing, which means
> finding bugs.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com