[libxml++] W3C DOM
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>
- To: libxml++ <libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: [libxml++] W3C DOM
- Date: 30 Sep 2003 09:18:44 +0200
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:17, Dan Dennedy wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 04:33, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > I am curious, has there been any discussion of W3C DOM API conformance?
> >
> > Do you mean the thing that the Xerces-C++ people proposed?
>
> I don't know anything about that, but xerxes is DOM-compliant. See
> http://w3.org/DOM/
> specifically
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Core-20001113/idl-definitions.html
I guess that's CORBA IDL and they expect people to create bindings
according to the CORBA standard C++ mapping specification? Or is it some
other kind of IDL? I don't see how MSXML could be compliant if it is
CORBA IDL.
I guess libxml's API is very non-compliant.
> I suppose you are referring to
> http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/ApacheDOMC++BindingL2.html
Yes, linked from here as a non-W3C DOM Binding::
http://www.w3.org/DOM/Bindings
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]