Re: [libxml++] libxml++ future
- From: Dan Dennedy <dan dennedy org>
- To: libxmlpp <Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [libxml++] libxml++ future
- Date: 26 Sep 2003 12:04:57 -0400
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 11:31, Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le Vendredi 26 Septembre 2003 17:11, Dan Dennedy a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 18:42, Christophe de Vienne wrote:
> >
> > > Another possible thing is to wrap xmlInputBuffer. Although we can (and
> > > did) implement parse_stream without it, it would permit to implement
> > > xmlTextReader.getRemainder() in an elegant way (cf. 3).
> >
> > I think this is good, but I am also very interested in SAX
> > serialization, perhaps based upon one of node iterators below. I think
> > you can count on that conribution coming from me.
> >
>
> I'm not familiar with this. Do you have any reference on it ?
> Thanks.
see the Component Pipelines section of
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2002/02/13/cocoon2.html
I think this is similar to what xmlsoft ML discussion and contributed
patch calls "inverted SAX." I don't know if it has been accepted into
libxml2. It is a simple idea tho--traverse tree while synthesizing SAX
events.
> >
> > I am also personally interested in entity-support in the near term.
> >
>
> Well, this is not so evident thing to handle (cf. messages of DV on xml
> mailing-list about SAX and entities).
hmm.. lots of reading to do here.
> What do you exactly need ?
> And do you have suggestions on how to do it ?
see response to murrayc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]