RE: [libxml++] sax_parser example: entity not defined
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: RE: [libxml++] sax_parser example: entity not defined
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:53:02 +0100
> > And that's what I'm concerned about. I find it surprising
> that libxml
> > would be broken by default, so I worry that we have done something
> > wrong. I will try to find the time to do those C tests.
>
> Maybe "broken" is a strong word to use in the technical
> perspective. By broken, I refer mostly to usability.
If it says that the reference is undeclared, and it is declared, then it's
broken, I think.
Again, there is nothing wrong with what your new stuff does. I think it's
wonderful. I just want to solve this little question. I need to do the
tests.
> BTW, here is how librsvg's entity-related callbacks. You
> think we should take this approach instead?
>
> static xmlEntityPtr
> rsvg_get_entity (void *data, const xmlChar *name)
> {
> RsvgHandle *ctx = (RsvgHandle *)data;
>
> return (xmlEntityPtr)g_hash_table_lookup
> (ctx->entities, name); }
Not until we find a problem with your simpler way.
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]