RE: [libxml++] Error Checking in parsers

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

Sounds OK. But I don't see why you can't release a new tarball first.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe de VIENNE [mailto:cdevienne alphacent com] 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 12:20
> To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> Subject: [libxml++] Error Checking in parsers
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I think we need to implement something a bit more clean and 
> solid for checking 
> errors after a parsing.
> 
> We already have a common function check_for_exception() which 
> check for 
> validity errors only.
> I propose to make it check it _context->errNo, so any error 
> libxml could 
> report we catch it.
> Since the errNo an int, I propose to modify parse_error class 
> to take a libxml 
> error number as a parameter in the constructor.
> 
> Comments/remarks welcome,
> 
> Christophe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+5wJYB+sU3TyOQjARAkGnAKCdVpkfwcqFRjj36OrTCNVU3tm2cACgm/Iu
> ZTJ5v+OfCVMDzXaHzzoVVkA=
> =LCtK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:  Etnus, makers of 
> TotalView, The best
> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general
>