On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 02:04, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 09:43, Christophe de VIENNE wrote: > > > I would like to try to include to it at least the dtd validation and a > > per-parser configuration instead of using global configuration. > > That would be nice, but I don't think I will do that work. Hi folks, The addition of DTD validation would be very nice! I'll be happy to test out that code and do whatever else I can to help. I'm currently using the CVS version from about a week ago after bumping into an exception bug in the 0.17 release (which was fixed in the CVS tree). Also, I'm looking forward to an API stabilization. *many* thanks! Ed -- Edward H. Hill III, PhD Post-Doctoral Researcher | Email: ed eh3 com, ehill mines edu Division of ESE | URLs: http://www.eh3.com Colorado School of Mines | http://cesep.mines.edu/people/hill.htm Golden, CO 80401 | Phones: 303-384-2094, 303-273-3483
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part