Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Status

[Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le Jeudi 6 Février 2003 14:51, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 14:49, Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Le Jeudi 6 Février 2003 13:53, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:26, Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> > > > What I can do is create a stable branch (BRANCH-1_0) with a branch
> > > > point just after your commit of Stefan patch, so it's last API
> > > > changes will stay in the default branch (which will become the
> > > > unstable one). This would probably avoid complicated mergings.
> > >
> > > Sounds great - personally I'm not sure how to do this. Please email
> > > when you've done it.
> >
> > After Stefan remark concerning it's patch, I think I'm goind to branch
> > before the initial patch commit.
>
> Which remark?

quoting Stefan (from the thread Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] resume of one 
day's work) :

"
In that light, I would really suggest we roll back *all* changes from my
side, i.e. branch for a 1.0-release using the version just before my
first patch went in. I think that, while quite limitted feature-wise,
this is a consistent and self-contained version.
"

>
> > Are you ok for that or do you prefer we keep initial Stefan patch into
> > stable branch ?
>
> We still have the patch in the patch manager so it's easy for me to
> apply it again.

It's not needed I can do the branching before or after. I just want to be sure 
we agree on the branch point place.


Cheers

Christophe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+Qmw3B+sU3TyOQjARAqrFAJ0bdnpxPDR6rF3k5jyxYKohDfXmmwCeJo5j
K/rWxf4T5ET5OrdaySsPGkQ=
=IwGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----