Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] DOM traversal and the semantics of 'get_attribute', 'get_content', etc.

[Stefan Seefeld <seefeld sympatico ca>]

Murray Cumming wrote:

> I think there's no question that an XML parser should do the necessary
> substitution according to the DTD. We don't need broken versions of the
> methods too.

I don't agree about anything being broken here. May be it's just an
issue about an incomplete API. As soon as there is a way to really 
traverse the tree, 'get_content' can do the 'right' thing.

> At the moment we seem to access private struct fields instead of using
> the libxml API. We need to fix this somehow.

Yes, agreed.

Stefan