RE: [libxml++] static libio



I wrote:
> I guess that debian even had debs of the unstable gtk+ 2.0.x 
> and 2.1.x phases,

Ignore the 2.0.x there. Of course that was stable.

> and maybe now gtk+ 2.3.x, but no 
> applications would stop the newer versions of gtk+ from 
> getting into debian.

Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]