[Libxmlplusplus-general] Re: [xml] Re: [gnomemm] ANNOUNCE: libxml++ is now sane.
- From: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- To: murrayc usa net
- Cc: gnomemm-list <gnomemm-list gnome org>, libxml-list <xml gnome org>, libxml++ <libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: [Libxmlplusplus-general] Re: [xml] Re: [gnomemm] ANNOUNCE: libxml++ is now sane.
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:24:56 -0500
>Personally, I have tried to avoid using add_child(Node* node) for this
>reason. I think it would be best to say
>"All Nodes must be created by DomParser, not by yourself."
i believe that this doesn't work when you are trying to build a tree
yourself before saving it back to disk. if you have a subtree built by
function B that is returned to function A for incorporation into the
nascent tree, its hard to see how you can get DomParser to handle
anything for you. i think.
--p
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]