Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] DOM validation

[Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne alphacent com>]

On Mercredi 25 Décembre 2002 02:19, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 17:37, Christophe de VIENNE wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Le Mercredi 18 Décembre 2002 16:30, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > > DV answered this thread about validation, but I never got round to
> > > implementing anything. Someone else might like to try it:
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2002-November/msg00153.html
> > >
> > > Personally I'd like optional validation of all parsing, but a separate
> > > validate() method would be a good start.
> >
> > I think this can comes with general parser options that we could set at
> > the Parser level. I wanted to do something like this with the
> > xmlKeepBlank option, and eventually all the possible options that can be
> > put in a context.
>
> You mean use the create-a-context way of parsing instead of
> xmlParseFile(), so that we can set per-parser options instead of global
> stuff like xmlKeepBlanksDefault() and
> xmlDoValidityCheckingDefaultValue(). Yes, that would be good. I don't
> like the idea of global settings.

This is exactly what I mean. I don't like global settings too...