Re: [sigc] What is changed in sigc::bind?

[Igor Gorbounov <igorbounov topazelectro ru>]

Murray Cumming пишет:
> [...]
> binding of non const references was never a very good idea, and not
> something that we expected people to use. I think we were forced to
> break it in order to fix a more serious issue. Using sigc::ref() might
> work, but I recommend that you just use pointers.
>
>   
Yes, I've replaced this reference with a pointer and it works now.
> Sorry for being vague. Take a look at the ChangeLog if you want more
> details.
>   
I've tried to find a hint in the Changelog but finally have given up - 
there were
too much of changes. Now you've explained the  case.
    Thanks.
      Igor Gorbounov