Re: [sigc] Proposal for standardization in C++ Library TR2

[Doug Gregor <dgregor cs indiana edu>]

On Jul 29, 2005, at 11:06 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think there is more than two names that needs to be decided on.
>
> With signal/slot we have at least: signal, slot, connection and emit
> (wheter the explit emit will be in the standard or not is a different
> subject)
>
> For publisher/subscriber this could be: publisher, subscriber,
> subscription and publish
>
> Are there other concepts in this framework that needs to be named?

There's the "trackable" class, which could potentially get a different 
name, but it doesn't have to. Signal, slot, and connection are the big 
ones.

Murray, Carl: How do you feel about this terminology?

	Doug