Re: [sigc] Re: [Boost-users] Signals & Slots

[Carl Nygard <cjnygard verizon net>]

On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:30 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 12:12 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:00 -0500, Carl Nygard wrote:
> > > http://www.3sinc.com/opensource/boost.bind-vs-sigc2.html
> > [snip]
> > > Docs updated.
> > [snip]
> > 
> > I thought I'd review this again, because I lost track of what changes
> > were made.
> > 
> > 1. In several cases, you show 
> >   sig.connect(&Func);
> > but show
> >   sig.connect(sigc::ptr_fun(&Func));
> > for the libsigc++ example.
> > 
> > But I believe (Am I correct, Martin?) that sig.connect(&Func) will work
> > with both APIs, and I believe that boost has a ptr_fun() too. It does
> > not seem to be an API difference.
> > 
> > 2. In "Automatic disconnection",
> > the use of operator() instead of a normal method will just cause
> > confusion.
> > 
> > 3. In "Slot Binders"
> > Can you expand on this question: "TODO: answer questions: a) What's up
> > with the No Clue entry, anyone?", please. In fact, please just ask your
> > TODO questions on this mailing list.
> > 
> > 4. Some of the "-ed" comments seem outdated now. It would be nice to
> > clean these up.
> 
> Carl, could you please make these changes. It would be very helpful.

Yeah I just took a look at the doc yesterday to see about porting it to
a wiki format, and was embarrassed to see those comments still there.
Got busy with work... you know how it goes.

BTW, should I even bother with the wiki business?  I figured a
collaborative editing process might be a good basis for the document,
but then again I have no experience with the C++ standards documentation
requirements (i.e. formatting, file formats, etc.)

Regards,
Carl