RE: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.0.4 under cygwin.....
- From: Kontogiannis Theophanis <tkonto aegean gr>
- To: 'Ulrich Eckhardt' <doomster knuut de>, libsigc-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.0.4 under cygwin.....
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 16:46:17 +0200
First of all I would like to thank you for your fast reply,
The problem is that access from sourseforge is not possible....
For some reason whatever file I try to download from ANY mirror I get the
error ...the file can not be accessed!!!!
As if the link is not live!
ANy ideas were else can I fetch a tar of the old libsigc++???
About the code:
fwbuilder (www.fwbuilder.org) actually looks for sigc-config and if not
found the configure script ends....
..................
checking for glib-config... /opt/gnome/bin/glib-config
checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.7... yes
checking for xml2-config... /usr/bin/xml2-config
checking for xmlSaveFormatFile... no
checking for xslt-config... /usr/bin/xslt-config
checking for sigc-config... no
configure: error: libsigc++ not present or not configured
thank you very much for your time.
Theophanis
-----Original Message-----
From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:uli doommachine dyndns org]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:16 PM
To: libsigc-list gnome org
Cc: Kontogiannis Theophanis
Subject: Re: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.0.4 under cygwin.....
On Thursday 22 January 2004 13:15, Kontogiannis Theophanis wrote:
> I try to compile libsigc++-1.0.4 (I have downladed the src RPMs from the
> freshrpm site) under the latest cygwin.
1.0 is pretty old...
> (I want to install fwbuilder - I have all the GNOME/GTK suite also
> installed).
>
> windres --include-dir ../sigc++/config sigc_res.rc -o sigc_res.o
> windres: no resources
>
> the sigc_res.rc file is empty.
Hmmmm.... can you verify the file's content from different source, to make
sure you didn't get a borken archive?
> I compiled also 1.2.5 version (wich is not the one needed for fwbuilder)
> and it compiled really nice....
I was maintaining a program that (with very few #ifdefs) compiled with both,
you might try your luck. Mostly it was that a few includes weren't available
with the newer version or vice versa.
In case compiling fails, show some code and we might be able to give you the
proper equivalent for 1.2.
good luck
Uli
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]