[sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Abandoning gcc 2.9*?

What about non-gcc compilers?

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
I'll ask this again, using the correct version number:

Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.95 (or even gcc <3.2). So if we use it
in gtkmm 2.4, gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.9*.

Who needs gcc 2.9* and why?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]