[sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Abandoning gcc 2.9*?

[Peter Gasper <pgasper designadvantage com>]

What is the gtk+ road map on this issue? I assume that if they dropped
support then gtkmm would by necessity do also. Do they have any good
reasons for continued support of 2.9*?

PG


On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:28, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> I'll ask this again, using the correct version number:
> 
> Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.95 (or even gcc <3.2). So if we use it
> in gtkmm 2.4, gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.9*.
> 
> Who needs gcc 2.9* and why?
> 
> Murray Cumming
> www.murrayc.com
> murrayc usa net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
-- 
Peter Gasper <pgasper designadvantage com>