[sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Abandoning gcc 2.9*?
- From: Peter Gasper <pgasper designadvantage com>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org, libsigc-list gnome org
- Subject: [sigc] Re: [gtkmm] Abandoning gcc 2.9*?
- Date: 07 Jan 2004 16:51:38 -0700
What is the gtk+ road map on this issue? I assume that if they dropped
support then gtkmm would by necessity do also. Do they have any good
reasons for continued support of 2.9*?
PG
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:28, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> I'll ask this again, using the correct version number:
>
> Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.95 (or even gcc <3.2). So if we use it
> in gtkmm 2.4, gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.9*.
>
> Who needs gcc 2.9* and why?
>
> Murray Cumming
> www.murrayc.com
> murrayc usa net
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtkmm-list mailing list
> gtkmm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
--
Peter Gasper <pgasper designadvantage com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]