Re: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?

[Randy Zagar <jrzagar cactus org>]

Since RedHat no longer supports any systems that were built with gcc-2.96, it's probably time to think about dropping it...

On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 09:26, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2004 16:34, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.96. So if we use it in gtkmm 2.4,
> > gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.96.
> > 
> > Who needs gcc 2.96 and why?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html
>
> Else, I saw those atrocities on Redhat and also recently on a Suse Alpha. I 
> think both have the option to upgrade to a real GCC.
>
> One question, what about gcc 2.95? Is it anywhere near usability?
>
> just my EUR 0.02
>
> Uli
>
> _______________________________________________
> libsigc-list mailing list
> libsigc-list gnome org
>     
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-list
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part