http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsigc-listOn Monday 05 January 2004 16:34, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote: > Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.96. So if we use it in gtkmm 2.4, > gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.96. > > Who needs gcc 2.96 and why? http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html Else, I saw those atrocities on Redhat and also recently on a Suse Alpha. I think both have the option to upgrade to a real GCC. One question, what about gcc 2.95? Is it anywhere near usability? just my EUR 0.02 Uli _______________________________________________ libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list gnome org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part