Re: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?
- From: Ulrich Eckhardt <eckhardt satorlaser com>
- To: libsigc-list gnome org
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:26:54 +0100
On Monday 05 January 2004 16:34, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.96. So if we use it in gtkmm 2.4,
> gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.96.
> Who needs gcc 2.96 and why?
Else, I saw those atrocities on Redhat and also recently on a Suse Alpha. I
think both have the option to upgrade to a real GCC.
One question, what about gcc 2.95? Is it anywhere near usability?
just my EUR 0.02
] [Thread Prev