Re: Re: [sigc] ANNOUNCE: libsigc++ 2.0.0
- From: martin-ml hippogriff de
- To: Ulrich Eckhardt <eckhardt satorlaser com>
- Cc: libsigc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Re: [sigc] ANNOUNCE: libsigc++ 2.0.0
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:51:35 +0200
Am 14.04.2004 um 11:34 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > *** libsigc++ 2.0
>
> Cool ;)
> Now I just wish I had time to use it...
>
> > Compatible compilers must supports the following recent c++
techniques:
> > * Partial template (function) specialization.
>
> This is one thing that struck me as odd, because standard C++ doesn't
allow
> partial specialization of function templates! Does it really require
this or
> is this the failed attempt to pack too much info in one sentence?
The latter is the case. There should be two points:
* Partial template specialization
* Explicit function template specialization
The second point is still causing trouble with the Sun FORTE C++. We
thought we were there after we found out that a compiler bug prevents
this to work with operators. However, our work-around doesn't compile
yet.
> cheers and thumbs up
Thanks!
Martin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]