Re: [sigc] 2.0.0 needed
- From: Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: libsigc++ list <libsigc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] 2.0.0 needed
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:35:50 +0200
Am 2004.04.12 10:53 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 10:22, martin-ml hippogriff de wrote:
> Am 09.04.2004 um 21:04 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > Martin, we need to release an API/ABI-stable libsigc++ 2.0.0 for
> April
> > 12th. Would you like me to make the changes, or do you want to do
it
> > yourself? If you do it yourself, please ask me to look it over
> before
> > you make the actual 2.0.0 tarball.
>
> Sorry for answering this late - I didn't have Internet access the
past
> three days. I will finish what is left to do this evening and
release
> 2.0.0. If you could e.g. see to the scirpts directory not-in-
tarball
> problem
I did that a couple of days ago.
Thanks!
> I could spend some time on the documentation of the adaptors
> before 'make distcheck'.
>
> By the way, one problem with 'make distcheck' I still have and
can't
> explain: It mocks about libsigc...so/.a not being _un_installed.
I don't see this. I'll make the tarball for you, if you like.
Strange. It must be a bug in my autotool versions if I'm the only
one who sees it. Apart from this problem, however, the tarballs I
create seem to be okay so I'll do it myself.
Regards,
Martin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]