Re: [sigc] 2.0.0 needed
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: martin-ml hippogriff de
- Cc: libsigc++ list <libsigc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [sigc] 2.0.0 needed
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:53:14 +0200
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 10:22, martin-ml hippogriff de wrote:
> Am 09.04.2004 um 21:04 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
> > Martin, we need to release an API/ABI-stable libsigc++ 2.0.0 for
> April
> > 12th. Would you like me to make the changes, or do you want to do it
> > yourself? If you do it yourself, please ask me to look it over
> before
> > you make the actual 2.0.0 tarball.
>
> Sorry for answering this late - I didn't have Internet access the past
> three days. I will finish what is left to do this evening and release
> 2.0.0. If you could e.g. see to the scirpts directory not-in-tarball
> problem
I did that a couple of days ago.
> I could spend some time on the documentation of the adaptors
> before 'make distcheck'.
>
> By the way, one problem with 'make distcheck' I still have and can't
> explain: It mocks about libsigc...so/.a not being _un_installed.
I don't see this. I'll make the tarball for you, if you like.
> It
> would be great if someone could bring some light to this.
>
> >
> > I know that we have not fixed the SUN Forte C++ build, but we have
> done
> > our best until we get access to a 5.5 version of the compiler. We
> must
> > simply hope that we can fix it one day without changing the API for
> the
> > gcc build.
>
> Okay.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
--
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc murrayc com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]