Re: new libbonobo API

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:

> Sorry for the massive delay in replying.
>
> This not entirely clear - I think there's some confusion between CORBA and
> Bonobo stuff here.
>
> But it doesn't look like something that's going to affect the C++ bindings.
> I think we already aggregate the C servers via client references, to
> implement new derived CORBA interfaces. It's probably a lot easier in C++
> because we don't deal with those C CORBA epv thingies much in the higher
> levels.
>
> But I'm not really sure what I'm talking about.
>  
The whole point of the new API is to be able to aggregate non C 
interfaces into a component together with interfaces implemented in C by 
libbonobo or libbonoboui.  The whole point is so that you don't need to 
worry about C EPVs, which is why I thought it might be useful for C++ as 
well.

Or do you not use any interfaces defined in C?  If so, do you 
reimplement things like BonoboControl (which is quite complex -- not the 
sort of thing I would want to redo in the Python bindings).

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/