Re: [HIG] OK - Cancel vs. Cancel - OK
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Tommi Komulainen <Tommi Komulainen iki fi>
- Cc: hig gnome org
- Subject: Re: [HIG] OK - Cancel vs. Cancel - OK
- Date: 25 Feb 2002 14:50:38 -0800
I don't feel like writing up another detailed discussion of this, but
the short answer is (copied from the dialog proposal):
" 1.
rationale: The eyes of people who read left-to-right tend towards
the upper-left and lower-right corners of boxes. Therefore the action
the user is most likely to perform should be located in the lower-right
corner. With this button order, the action the user is most likely to
perform is always in the same place and is always the most noticeable."
-seth
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 09:08, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While writing a bug report against galeon for its inconsistent ordering
> of buttons I started thinking about HIG and its recommendations.
>
> Now, as far as I've seen and can remember, in GNOME1 the order of
> buttons has been OK-Cancel. Not to mention KDE which also uses
> OK-Cancel ordering.¹ Now, why is HIG (which I suppose is followed in
> GNOME2) recommending the exact opposite? It feels unbelievably
> counterproductive.
>
>
> 1. Very brief test performed by launching konqueror and checking some
> menus.
>
> --
> Tommi Komulainen Tommi Komulainen iki fi
> GPG 1024D/68388EE6 6FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]