Re: [HIG] Another alternative

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>]

On 22Oct2001 01:03AM (-0700), Adam Elman wrote:
> >  > The main reason I propose this is that I think IG2H is in a further
> >>  state of completion than the HIG, so it would save us a significant
> >>  amount of time to get to a final, postable version. 
> >
> >If it's really easier to improve, fine, but it would knock the review
> >effort way back. How many weeks have we now spent on writing and
> >reviewing the previous document?
> >
> >I think we'd be better off adopting parts of the other document on a
> >section by section basis where appropriate.
> 
> Actually, the more I think about it, this is probably a better 
> approach.  Folks, please do take a look at IG2H and mpt's review 
> (along with others) and consider where we might be able to do this.
> 

I already suggested a couple of parts we could steal from it wholesale
("Principles" chapter, "Windows" chapter) in my review comments. :-)

Regards,

Maciej