Thanks for your response.
El abr 1, 2014 2:35 p.m., "Richard Schwarting" <richard schwarting ca> escribió:
>
> No.
>
> It is large, complicated, and makes unnecessary changes.
I think we need more than just say that.
> It also consumes all my free time that I have to work on GXml trying to restart reviews on
I haven't seen you working on GXml in months.
> it since earlier ones never had their concerns addressed.b
>
>
Again please!!! Send to this list your concerns, even the ones at early commits I can explain you what and why each.
I've been waiting for a while with no comment.
All my work always have been public at early stages.
I think we can't hold my work indefinitely.
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com> wrote:
>>
>> I've found serialization branch ready to merge.
>>
>> * Fixed and stabilized Serialization framework
>> * Fixed and running win32/win64 compilation
>>
>> Task TODO:
>>
>> * Fix Unit Test in order to get no error/warning messages
>> * Clean up Serialization class in order to support default and user defined
>> serialization method for GObjects
>>
>>
>> --
>> Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
>> "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los cuates: LIBRE)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gxml-list mailing list
>> gxml-list gnome org
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gxml-list
>>
>