Re: [RFC] gvfs connected servers

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:42 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 10:37 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 19:56 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> <snip>
> > > Fixing issue 3. is also needed for the gphoto2 backend to support
> > > multiple storage heads
> > > 
> > >  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520123
> > 
> > I don't think there is a need for this to solve that bug. It could
> > easily have two mounts for the same camera and still use only one
> > connection to it internally.
> 
> It makes the code crrrraaaaap! See the patch attached in comment 12, and
> realise that locking is missing everywhere around the gphoto calls.
> 
> Ugly, ugly.

Ok. So could we use the same approach approach as in my mail then? One
GMount for the root, and then virtual symlink mounts for the volumes
that just point to the root mount?