Re: [guppi-list] Re: guppi segfault

["Thomas R. Shannon" <tshanno bsd medctr luc edu>]

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Thomas R. Shannon wrote:
> > 
> > Hmmm.  I suppose this means that if I'm willing to compile guile from
> > source, I can get this to work.  I really don't want to do that.  I
> > lose track of what's rpm and what isn't.
> >
> 
> You shouldn't have to if Red Hat's dependencies are correct. That is, they
> should have a Guile that matches the new libraries. Perhaps you only need
> to recompile Goose? Did you compile it or part of of it before upgrading?
> I would be sure you have the latest header files (does RH put these in
> -devel packages?) and then make clean and rebuild everything. 

I did a "make uninstall" on the following (in order): 1. guppi,
2. goose, 3. gnome-print.  "rpm -e guile guile-devel".  "rpm -Uvh
guile-1.3-2.i686.rpm guile-devel-1.3-2.i686.rpm".  "make install"
gnome-print-0.2, goose-0.0.9, (ldconfig) and guppi-0.10.0.  Compiles
were clean with no errors.  Same segfault, same backtrace.

I'll consider myself sol on this machine and monitor future releases.
At least you're aware of the problem.  I'm sure it will get tracked
down eventually.

Tom
------------
Quote of the day for Thursday, 1 July, 1999:

"I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas.  I'm
frightened 
of old ones."

  - John Cage (1912-1992)