Re: GUPnP device description handling

[Jens Georg <mail jensge org>]

On Mo, 2012-05-07 at 16:49 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Branislav Katreniak
> <branislav katreniak streamunlimited com> wrote:
> >> True but note that In your case, its not the template file that will
> >> be available but the completed desc file that you point gupnp to.
> >
> > My only point was, that we like more the API that does not force us to
> > create the temporary file.
> > Gupnp library can serialize the xml document in memory buffer and serve it.
> 
> Ah yes, that would be indeed nice.
> 
I just stumbled upon this while writing some unittests here and wondered
if there's any reason for the way it's done currently of if it just
happens to be historically grown.