Re: Sponsor's logos in the webpage

[Stormy Peters <stormy gnome org>]

There aren't two silver categories. All of them are the same type of
silver right?

Stormy

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Sense Hofstede <sense ubuntu com> wrote:
> I wasn't aware they were Silver Sponsors as well. What should we do?
> Move the companies to the 'highest' category they fit in, or find a
> way to mention both categories? I'd be in favour of using the first
> for the front page, the second method is already somewhat implemented
> on the Sponsors' Page, sufficiently in my opinion (if we'd move some
> companies to the categories, the strong text already tells about the
> other categories/roles), but do you agree?
>
> CC'ing Stormy and Reinout to give them a chance to give their opinion
> on this as well.
>
> Thanks for noticing, William!
>
> On 27 July 2010 09:53, William from Texas <williamfromtexas gmail com> wrote:
>> hey Sense
>>
>> thanks for adding the 'silver' etc tags to the sponsor page.. but now there
>> are 2 'silver' categories? those at the very top, and then at the bottom
>> fluendo, flumotion and ictivity are also in a silver category. should the be
>> separate like this?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Germán Póo-Caamaño <gpoo gnome org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:09 +0200, Sense Hofstede wrote:
>>> > On 15 July 2010 02:16, Germán Póo-Caamaño <gpoo gnome org> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hello webmasters,
>>> > >
>>> > > I was reading the GUADEC webpage and I noticed the logos of the
>>> > > sponsors
>>> > > are not categorized.  They appear in alphabetical order except the
>>> > > last
>>> > > three ones.
>>> > >
>>> > > Even it they looked assorted, it should be clarified which kind of
>>> > > sponsors they are.  Otherwise, companies might think it does not make
>>> > > any difference to sponsor with more or less money.
>>> > >
>>> > > Finally, AFAIK, Linux Magazine is a media partner.  I also think, we
>>> > > should state that.
>>> > >
>>> > > Is it possible to check them?
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks in advance,
>>> > > [...]
>>> >
>>> > I'll look into it, thanks for noticing!
>>>
>>> Sense,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to fix it asap in the webpage?
>>>
>>> I noticed the mistake was made also in the badges, which can not be
>>> fixed, but to make less upset to our sponsors it worth to fix it in the
>>> webpage.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> PS: I know you might be stressed with all stuffs, but sponsors pay a lot
>>> of attention to this sort of things.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Germán Póo-Caamaño
>>> http://www.gnome.org/~gpoo/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> guadec-web-list mailing list
>>> guadec-web-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-web-list
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> guadec-web-list mailing list
>> guadec-web-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-web-list
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sense Hofstede
> http://sensehofstede.nl/
>