Re: [guadec-local] (no subject)



My opinion on this was only an opinion, and I will go along with whatever version of the CoC the rest of you are comfortable using. 

Like Fabiana already said, debating this may just end up taking unwarranted time out of an already tight budget.

Best,

    Christopher Svanefalk
    
    GitHub: https://github.com/csvan    
    Cell: +46762628251
    Skype: csvanefalk
    
    
 
   


On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Skyman <skymandr fripost org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2015-06-16 22:07, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 06:43 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote:
>> So would I.
>>
>> By the way Ryan proposed another text which I think was better
>> than this one and it seems it hasn't been taken into account.
>
> I really wanted to stay out of this discussion, because it's full
> of bees, but here we go. Where is Ryan's version of a CoC?


I obviously can't speak for the entire local team, but I for one am
very happy with the CoC Jonas has suggested. If Ryan's version is the
one bandied about IRC a few weeks back, I much prefer the version we hav
e.

/A

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVgIWiAAoJEBCumc4j//Ziyv0H/0cyObD8rrVccW4rZJzzYLSk
YhuvzOMG9uKrkTJO2XbsIJNufAiZtF3cKFG8fXEeskREvQlcDxIMKYpMB1m4J7mS
+/w4BGCiufZMxhl8WVJf/7DZTilQ1cn9nSB+SnFcroHV+eAAujpvpDuAROEA320j
8GoScMFW/V0g1aKksFZOdsWNfQ8ILTq93UuEN1OjAPVdbWrrfU8GkGh1uXbwexuz
90VmQKLhHjwdLi9cq4zRb/4Ee5GJzwJi+/exW2bkU4lYWkc1NB3rWI+Th/ZBHl3J
RhMWwaQZS1u3LPGUltEotFkqOHWVIxVKDMtM6/Beink5KQsFhmhPCJs+LGXax0s=
=R3TL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
guadec-local mailing list
guadec-local gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-local



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]