After printing both... I am for the blue. This document is sent to organisations that will need to decide whether they give us money or not. It's easy that this brochure ends up being printed in several black&white copies for a meeting. The blue is more readable in these conditions, since white fonts with yellow background is a more challenging combination for a printer. Also, the website seems to take the blue path, although we haven't made any decisition yet. En/na Quim Gil ha escrit: > My first impression is that blue looks more refreshing than the Yellow, > I had a better feeling. Can't offer any objective comment though. :) > > > The links are a bit hidden in the wiki page: > > http://live.gnome.org/GUADEC2006_2fSponsorsBrochure?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=GUADEC-Sponsor-Brochure-blue.pdf > http://live.gnome.org/GUADEC2006_2fSponsorsBrochure?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=GUADEC-Sponsor-Brochure-yellow.pdf > > > A couple of things about the Vilanova paragraphs in page 3 (English > speakers please correct me): > > > - Vilanova i la Geltrú is a city in Catalonia (Spain), 40km south of > Barcelona. It has... > > - ... is only 20km away from the Barcelona International Airport... > > - Visitors can also stay... > > > - It's CampusMed, not CampuMed > > - The Campus Universitari de la Mediterrània is a joint project... > > It looks very good! > > > > En/na Ludovic Danigo ha escrit: > >>I made a Quick & Dirty goldish logo to see how it >>would fit the Brochure and made a Quick & Dirty blue >>version to see how it would fit the logo :-) >> >>Which one do you prefer? >> >>The yellow one is the reference for content. >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > guadec-list mailing list > guadec-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature