Re: Help proposal for libgdamm

[Pavlo Solntsev <p sun fun gmail com>]

Hi,

Just would like to follow up on our previous conversation. The libgda
master CI was broken and finally got fixed recently. All test and
compilation should be ok. I tried to compile libgdamm and do see some
issues due to last-two-years activity in libgda. It may be a good idea
to setup a CI for libgdamm. I will try to play with that. Let me know
if you have a specific plan to move forward. 

Best,
-Pavlo.

On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 16:20 +0100, murrayc murrayc com wrote:
> Your help would be much appreciated. Actually, I had difficulty even
> building libgda.
>
> On 23 Jan 2020 15:25, Pavlo Solntsev via gtkmm-list <
> gtkmm-list gnome org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I saw some recent activities in libgdamm repo. However, I checked
> > and
> > it looks like the library can't be compiled because of changes in
> > libgda code. Would it be be possible to open issues for work that
> > needs
> > to be done? I can help with porting some code. For now, I am
> > cleaning
> > documentation for lilbgda and found that some API introduced in the
> > dev
> > version (6.0) can be obsolete. Technically, this is not obsolete,
> > since
> > we didn't have a stable version yet. For instance, a lot of DDL
> > operations were moved to the new GdaDB... module and having
> > redundant
> > API is not the best approach. Anyway, I would like to coordinate
> > work
> > on libgdamm if possible. Thanks.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list