Re: enums that are really just sets of constants

[Jonathan Wakely <gtkmm kayari org>]

On 19 April 2017 at 11:51, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> Den 2017-04-19 kl. 12:24, skrev Murray Cumming:
>
> On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 10:30 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> You can also use a namespace to give them their own scope, which has
> less overhead than a class type (no RTTI for the class, no way for
> users to create instances of the class type, or pointers to it, which
> would have no purpose if it's just being used to create a new scope
> for the enumerators).
>
> Good point.
>
> I'm leaning towards this at the moment.
>
> Is it possible to define a namespace within a class?

No.