Re: Supporting C++17

[Jonathan Wakely <gtkmm kayari org>]

On 4 April 2017 at 14:52, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Any ideas about how we should support C++17 in gtkmm-3.0 without losing
> C++11/14 compatibility and without breaking ABI?

Replace all dynamic exception specifications with noexcept(false) (or
just no exception specification). That's not an ABI change.


> Or should we require C++17 for later gtkmm-3.0 versions?

I think that would be premature, GCC support for it is still experimental.

> Noticed here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438766