Re: Is libgnomedbmm obsolete?

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Do, 2016-07-28 at 09:59 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> There is an open gtkmm bug that actually concerns libgnomedbmm, https
> ://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768819
> That made me wonder about the status of both libglademm and
> libgnomedbmm.
> Both libglade, libglademm, libgnomedb and libgnomedbmm are listed as
> products in Bugzilla, but with different classification.
> libglade: Deprecated
> libglademm: Otherlibgnomedb: Deprecated
> libgnomedbmm: Other
> The deprecated products are found only on Bugzilla's search page.
>
> Should libglademm and libgnomedbmm also be classified as deprecated?

Yes. libglademm is replaced by Gtk::Builder. libgnomedbmm is replaced
by libgdamm.

> I know that libglademm has been superseded by Gtk::Builder.
> I don't know much about libgnomedbmm. Is it correct that
> libgnomedb(mm) is a GUI for libga(mm)? Recent versions of libgda
> contain GUI classes like GdauiGrid and GdauiForm. It looks like
> libgnomedb has become a part of libgda. Has libgnomedbmm been
> superseded by libgda-uimm?
>
> When I built libgdamm and libgda-uimm from the latest code in the git
> repository, I noticed that both libgdamm and libgda-uimm needed some
> fixes in order to build. They have not kept up with the latest
> changes in libgda. Would it be a good idea for me to update them?

I wouldn't waste time on them, if I was you.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com