Time in Glibmm and libgdamm
- From: Pavlo Solntsev <p_solntsev meta ua>
- To: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Time in Glibmm and libgdamm
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:26:20 -0600
Hi, (my first email didn't go well)
My question about Glibmm and libgdamm. I code only in c++. I faced this
problem when I wanted to save Date and Time into SQL database using
libgdamm. SQL by itself provides two types: DATE and TYPE. They are
good match for Glib::Date class, which already exist, and Glib::Time,
which doesn't exist.
I can use GdaTime via std::time_t but this is ugly way for OO. Some
other libraries including boost provide class to handle time.
Could please explain me, why we have this situation with Time? It is so
ambiguous and confusing. I will be glad to help with implementation of
Glib::Time class.
I would like a solution where Glib::Time and Glib::Date classes are
parent classes for Glib::DataTime. It will allow to manipulate DATATIME
type in SQL.
Thanks.
From documentation:
typedef gint32 GTime;
Simply a replacement for time_t. It has been deprecated since it is not
equivalent to time_t on 64-bit platforms with a 64-bit time_t.
Unrelated to GTimer.
Note that GTime is defined to always be a 32-bit integer, unlike time_t
which may be 64-bit on some systems. Therefore, GTime will overflow in
the year 2038, and you cannot use the address of a GTime variable as
argument to the UNIX time() function.
Some time related classes found in Glib and Gnome::Gda namespace
1) Glib::Date
2) Glib::DateTime
3) Glib::TimeVal
4) Gnome::Gda::Timestemp ( or GdaTimestamp)
5) Gnome::Gda::Time ( or GdaTime)
Another unrelated topic. Since libgda will be developed by itself, it
would be clearer to have all class in Gda namespace. For back
compatibility, we may typedef Gda namespace to Gnome::Gda.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]