Re: Building from git (without C++ 11)

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 18:16 +0100, John Emmas wrote:
> I couldn't find a mailing list for pangomm so I'm hoping this will get 
> through to the devs somehow...
>
> I noticed today that pangomm now requires C++11 - BUT...
>
> The latest stable branch (in git) seems to be languishing at around 
> 2.24.  We've come a long way since then and are now up to at least 2.34 
> (possibly 2.36?)
>
> For those of us still using older compilers, would it be possible for 
> the devs to create a new branch?  One which corresponds to the last 
> version which DIDN'T need C++11?  (i.e. a 2.36 branch, or whatever).  
> It's just that for people in the same boat as me, building from git 
> master won't be feasible any more - but it'd be useful to be able to 
> track any future changes / fixes if any get applied to 2.36.  Thanks.

Here is a pangomm-2-36 branch:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/pangomm/log/?h=pangomm-2-26

As usual, I think it's unwise to build from git if you aren't working on
the actual code.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com