Re: includes in enums.hg

[Juan Rafael García Blanco <juanrgar gmail com>]

Thank you very much. Understood.

On 27 Feb 2014, at 12:38, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 13:35 +0200, fr33domlover wrote:
> > If this is a problem, a preprocessor macro can be added to prevent that
> > warning. GTK seems to use GTK_COMPILATION and and __GTK_H_INSIDE__ or
> > something like that, which allow individual header inclusion.
>
> I would prefer to avoid hacking around it. When we get some strange
> side-effect then it would be our own fault.
>
> > They could also add another switch, e.g. BINDING_COMPILATION, so
> > bindings can compile faster by including specific headers.
> >
> > Just an idea... or just include gtk.h everywhere, it's fine as long as
> > the build takes reasonable time.
>
> It's not an issue of compile time. We generally just prefer to avoid
> bringing in unnecessary declarations, particularly when we must include
> a GTK+ header in a gtkmm header. C headers are not as clean as C++
> headers.
>
> But it's not an actual problem eight now.
>
> -- 
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com