Re: Update libchamplainmm

Agreed. Thanks. If Debarshi has no objection I'll proceed that way.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 11:58 +0100, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote:

I would be much more than happy to take office :) This is a great
opportunity to learn a lot from this extremely helpful community,
although it is also a challenge.

I think I should upload my branch to in a separate
branch. I think we should keep master where it is right now until
libchamplainmm-0.12 gets not only stabilized but also a bit complete.
Does this sound like a good plan?

In my branch I tried to keep structure and code as much as similar to
what I've seen in gtkmm, to ease an eventual review from the

(I'm not maintainer, but) it would be more normal to branch the existing
code and then put the new code in master. I've seen enough of your work
not to worry about it, and I doubt anybody is using this code (and not
from git) now anyway.

murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]