Re: Gdk::RGBA

[Milosz Derezynski <internalerror gmail com>]

On a further note, it would be desirable if a build mixed of gtk+2 and gtk+3 would not even succeed in compilation (I know, gtk-devel.. I might actually investigate into that further).

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:

On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:50 +0300, ahmet öztürk wrote:
> Kjell, thank you very much for the explanations.
>
> Actually, in vanilla tarball gtkspell-3.0 is used. When I try to compile
> it in Ubuntu oneiric (11.10), it fails complaining that gtkspell-3.0
> could not be found
> ( https://launchpadlibrarian.net/110202120/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.lifeograph_0.9.0-1~ppa4~oneiric_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz ). That's why I tried my luck with with gtkspell-2.0. (Although there is a package with an uncanny name in the repos ( http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libgtkspell3-0 ), obviously it cannot be used by saying "pkg-config gtkspell-3.0".)
>
> OTOH, I tried to mix gtkmm-3.4 with gtkspell-2.0 and strangely enough
> managed to build a binary without getting any warning although the
> resulting binary could not be executed for the very reason you
> mentioned. This level of "success" with gtkmm-3.4 makes me doubt that
> gtkspell-2.0 is the cause behind RGBA errors.

Well, you cannot mix GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3, so there's little point in
investigating further until you've fixed that.

--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com

_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

-- 
Everything is Original.