RE: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0
- From: "Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063)" <james c tilton nasa gov>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: "gtkmm-list gnome org" <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:34:02 -0600
Thanks, Murray. I'll just have my gtkmm-2.4 version go back to my original approach then.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Murray Cumming [mailto:murrayc murrayc com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 2:06 PM
To: Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063)
Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Question concerning changes in Gtk::Adjustment from gtkmm-2.4 vs. gtkmm-3.0
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 10:14 -0600, Tilton, James C. (GSFC-6063) wrote:
[snip]
> I tried to mimic this in my new gtkmm-2.4 code as follows:
>
>
>
> Glib::RefPtr<Gtk::Adjustment>
> local_hadjustment((scrolled_Window.get_hadjustment()));
>
> Glib::RefPtr<Gtk::Adjustment>
> local_vadjustment((scrolled_Window.get_vadjustment()));
[snip]
That's just not a good idea. You cannot use Gtk::Adjustment via RefPtr
in gtkmm-2.4.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]