Re: gtkmm 3.0.
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- Cc: Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkmm 3.0.
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:31:47 +0100
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 12:35 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> as i've mentioned to daniel on IRC, it would make our life in ardour
> MUCH easier if all gtkmm objects were reference counted with both weak
> and strong references available. we have a very nasty and hard to deal
> with situation right now where we schedule a callback on a GUI object
> from a non-GUI thread, and by the time the callback is executed, the
> GUI object has been deleted.
I think that's something else that we need to see example code for. How
can we support both easily?
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]