Re: Dbus bindings: dbus-cxx or dbus-c++?

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:44 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0200
> Germán Diago <germandiago gmail com> wrote:
> > Hello. I'm looking for c++ bindings for dbus in gnome. I would like
> > to know which
> > of these bindings I should use.
> > For what I saw it looks like dbus-cxx is better mantained. Is
> > dbus-c++ still actively mantained? Are they usable for real projects?
> > Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> >
> Finger trouble.  What I meant to say was:
> Presumably the next glibmm release will wrap GDBus, which seems the
> best target to aim for if you can wait for it.

Actually, it would be great if someone could look at that. Thanks to
Jose, we now have Glib::Variant, wrapping GVariant, which it uses.

These links seems to be relevant:

Maybe we should start by wrapping this:
and this:
murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]