Re: Dbus bindings: dbus-cxx or dbus-c++?

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:44 +0100, Chris Vine wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:19:49 +0200
> Germán Diago <germandiago gmail com> wrote:
> > Hello. I'm looking for c++ bindings for dbus in gnome. I would like
> > to know which
> > of these bindings I should use.
> > For what I saw it looks like dbus-cxx is better mantained. Is
> > dbus-c++ still actively mantained? Are they usable for real projects?
> > Thanks in advance. _______________________________________________
> > gtkmm-list mailing list
> > gtkmm-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
> 
> Finger trouble.  What I meant to say was:
> 
> Presumably the next glibmm release will wrap GDBus, which seems the
> best target to aim for if you can wait for it.

Actually, it would be great if someone could look at that. Thanks to
Jose, we now have Glib::Variant, wrapping GVariant, which it uses.

These links seems to be relevant:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-lowlevel.html
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/gdbus-convenience.html

Maybe we should start by wrapping this:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusConnection.html
and this:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gio/unstable/GDBusMessage.html
-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com