Re: Gtkmm and fork()

[Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>]

On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:25:26 +0100
Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk> wrote:
> In a program which is already multi-threaded I think I would go down
> the thread-fork route.  Where not, your solution looks good.

Actually, in an already multi-threaded program you would have to go
down the thread-fork route, as I am pretty sure that there is something
in Gtk::Main::quit() (if only a g_free() somewhere) which is not
async-signal-safe.

Chris