Re: gtkmm and gtk-osx
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkmm and gtk-osx
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:03:11 +0200
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:04 +0200, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 15:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 05:54 -0700, Chris Share wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > first thing to realize: you *must* build gtk-osx from source, along with
> > > the whole GTK dependency stack. jhbuild makes this pretty easy, most of
> > > the time.
> > [snip]
> >
> > Why isn't the new "framework" good enough?
> > http://www.gtk-osx.org/
>
> its OK for developers to use if they have no need to do deeper level
> debugging (i.e. modify the code).
Well that's as true (not needed generally, I mean) for Linux and Windows
as for MacOS, I'd guess.
> i can't imagine feeling comfortable with this at this time. i need to be
> able to add printf/cerr statements as needed, and using a framework
> conflicts with that.
>
> in addition, there are many important fixes to gtk/osx that show up;
> relying on the framework can put you out of date with those fixes (or
> breakage) much more easily than using jhbuild.
>
> its particularly true for ardour, where we have our own patches to
> gtk/osx that have not yet made it into svn (and may never).
>
> --p
>
>
>
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]