Re: Moving pangomm into its own tarball

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 10:30 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:      
> >> would this mean splitting it into a separate svn repository too, or not?
> >>     
> >
> > Yes, that would be sensible.
> >   
> Yes, it seems sensible to me as well.  But it also seems like it could 
> be a bit painful to extract unless the plan is to just drop all previous 
> history and 'svn rm' it from the old repository and 'svn add' it to the 
> new one (which I personally think is a bad idea).  Maybe the GNOME 
> sysadmins can do svn surgery somehow.

I guess it would be enough to start the new pangomm module as a copy of
gtkmm and then remove the part we don't want.

But GNOME sysadmin help is currently hard to find (though not as bad as
it once was), so I might be forced to just drop the history.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com