Re: Implementing containers

["Milosz Derezynski" <internalerror gmail com>]

The point is though that the class function gets overridden by Gtkmm's
Container anyway (in plain code terms), so while it's possible that
the Gtkmm variant does nothing either, at least the default C default
printing the warning should never get called (i'm sure that's what
boggled murryac when he tried to find out the reason for the warning
as well).

As for the status, i had no time checking further yet.

-- Milosz

On 9/22/07, Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 12:29 -0500, Mark Tilford wrote:
> > Any luck on figuring this out?
> >
> > On 9/11/07, Milosz Derezynski <internalerror gmail com> wrote:
> > > Yeah but Gtk::Container does a class vfunc override, so it should
> > > never be called. I'm looking for the problem deeper now simply because
> > > it bugs me that it exists (shouldn't be there!)
>
> Gtk::Container is an abstract class. It does nothing more than provide a
> dummy "remove" implementation. A derived widget (e.g Box, Table, Bin
> etc) has to provide its own implementation (and in the gtkmm versions,
> they do).
>
> --p
>
>
>
>