Re: hal++ announcement
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Daniel Elstner <daniel kitta googlemail com>
- Cc: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere man levallois eu org>, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: hal++ announcement
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:16:11 +0100
Yes, boost::signals and libsigc++ and the proposed C++ standard signals
are all similar, because we've all worked together.
For now, libsigc++ is the best choice for use in an API that itself
wants to become API/ABI stable, because it's the only one that that is
API/ABI stable.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
